Dynkin's Formula

Dynkin's Formula Beyond Compact Support Exit Times, Recurrence, and Polar Points

Dynkin's Formula

Two results stand ready and have not yet been put in the same sentence. The stopped expectation identity concerns a general Itô process, under hypotheses that the proof below checks one by one, and a compactly supported \(C^2\) function evaluated at a stopping time of finite mean. It writes the average of that function at the stopping time as its initial value plus an accumulated second-order expression. The generator theorem identifies that expression, for a diffusion, as the value of the generator. Putting the second inside the first is the formula of this section.

The gain is not computational. Nothing in the resulting statement is harder or easier to evaluate than what went into it. The gain is that the coefficients disappear. The identity as first proved speaks of \(\mathbf{u}\) and the entries of \(\mathbf{v} \mathbf{v}^\top\), which are features of a particular equation. The formula below speaks only of \(A\), which is defined from the process alone, with no equation mentioned. Two equations with the same generator therefore obey the same formula, and a question about averages can be posed and answered without ever exhibiting the coefficients that produced the process.

Throughout, the setting is the several-component one in which the generator was defined. The state space is \(\mathbb{R}^m\), the driving motion \(\mathbf{w}\) is an \(n\)-dimensional Brownian motion carrying the filtration \(\{ \mathcal{F}_t^{(n)} \}\) of the multi-dimensional Itô integral, the coefficients are Lipschitz, and \(E^x\) denotes the average over the diffusion started at \(x\). The diffusion as a family rests on the several-component reading as declared there, and nothing on this page reproves it.

Theorem: Dynkin's Formula

Let \(X\) be an Itô diffusion in \(\mathbb{R}^m\) with generator \(A\), let \(x \in \mathbb{R}^m\), let \(f \in C_0^2( \mathbb{R}^m )\), and let \(\tau\) be a stopping time for \(\{ \mathcal{F}_t^{(n)} \}\) with \(E^x[ \tau ] \lt \infty\). Then

\[ E^x \bigl[ f( X_\tau ) \bigr] = f( x ) + E^x \Bigl[ \int_0^\tau A f( X_s )\, ds \Bigr] . \]

Proof.

The diffusion is an Itô process whose coefficients are \(\mathbf{b}\) and \(\sigma\) read along the path. Its membership in that class, and the boundedness of the coefficients over the support of \(f\), were both verified when the generator was computed, the latter from continuity on a compact set. With \(f \in C_0^2( \mathbb{R}^m )\) and \(E^x[ \tau ] \lt \infty\) assumed, every requirement of the stopped expectation identity is met, and it gives

\[ E^x \bigl[ f( X_\tau ) \bigr] = f( x ) + E^x \Bigl[ \int_0^\tau \Bigl( \sum_{i} b_i\, \partial_i f + \tfrac{1}{2} \sum_{i, l} \bigl( \sigma \sigma^\top \bigr)_{il}\, \partial_{il} f \Bigr)( X_s )\, ds \Bigr] . \]

The generator theorem states that for \(f \in C_0^2\) the bracketed expression equals \(A f\) at every point of \(\mathbb{R}^m\), so the two integrands agree at every \(( s, \omega )\), and the displays are the same statement written twice.

The hypotheses are worth separating by the work they do. Compact support is what makes the identity applicable at all. Together with the continuity of the coefficients, it bounds the integrands and so secures the class membership that Itô's formula demands of them. Finiteness of \(E^x[ \tau ]\) is what makes the stopping time usable. It forces \(\tau\) to be finite almost surely, so that \(X_\tau\) exists, bounds the accumulated integral by a constant multiple of the integrable variable \(\tau\), and meets the square-integrability hypothesis under which the noise term averages to zero.

Of the two hypotheses, the first restricts \(f\) and the second restricts \(\tau\). The next section trades the one for the other. Compact support is dropped there, at the cost of specializing the stopping time to an exit time.

Considerably more general versions of the formula exist, in which \(f\) is required only to be sufficiently regular near the range of the stopped path and the stopping time is controlled by weaker means. They belong to a theory of Markov processes broader than the one this track develops, and nothing here will need them.

Beyond Compact Support

Compact support is an awkward hypothesis in practice, because the functions one wants to feed to the formula are rarely compactly supported. The squared distance to the origin is not, and neither is a logarithm or a power of the radius. These are exactly the functions whose behavior under a diffusion one wants to know. The hypothesis is also visibly stronger than the situation requires. If the stopping time is the moment the path first leaves a bounded region, then the path never visits anything outside that region before being stopped, and the values of \(f\) far away cannot possibly matter.

Turning that observation into a proof costs one construction. Replace \(f\) by a compactly supported function agreeing with it near the region, apply the formula already proved, and observe that neither side can tell the two functions apart.

The operator appearing in the conclusion is then the differential operator of the diffusion, which is defined for every twice continuously differentiable \(f\) and agrees with \(A\) on \(C_0^2( \mathbb{R}^m )\). Stating the conclusion with \(L\) rather than \(A\) is not fussiness. For a general \(f \in C^2\) the limit defining \(A f\) need not exist, since the averages \(E^x[ f( X_t ) ]\) need not even be finite.

Theorem: Dynkin's Formula on a Bounded Region

Let \(X\) be an Itô diffusion in \(\mathbb{R}^m\), let \(U \subseteq \mathbb{R}^m\) be open and bounded, let \(x \in U\), and let \(\tau\) be the first exit time of \(X\) from \(U\), assumed to satisfy \(E^x[ \tau ] \lt \infty\). Then for every \(f \in C^2( \mathbb{R}^m )\),

\[ E^x \bigl[ f( X_\tau ) \bigr] = f( x ) + E^x \Bigl[ \int_0^\tau L f( X_s )\, ds \Bigr] . \]

Proof.

The stopped path stays in the closure.
For \(s \lt \tau( \omega )\) the definition of the first exit time gives \(X_s( \omega ) \in U\). The time \(\tau( \omega )\) is positive, because the path starts in the open set \(U\), and it is finite almost surely, because \(E^x[ \tau ]\) is. At \(s = \tau( \omega )\) continuity of the path therefore makes \(X_\tau\) a limit of points of \(U\), so \(X_\tau \in \overline{U}\). Hence the whole stopped path lies in \(\overline{U}\), a compact set since \(U\) is bounded.

A compactly supported twin.
Since \(U\) is bounded, there is an \(R\) with \(\overline{U}\) contained in the open ball \(B_R\) of radius \(R\) about the origin. The smooth bump function with radii \(R\) and \(R + 1\) is a smooth \(\psi : \mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}\) equal to \(1\) on \(\overline{B_R}\) and vanishing outside \(B_{R + 1}\). Put \(g = \psi f\). A product of a smooth function with a \(C^2\) one is \(C^2\), and \(g\) vanishes wherever \(\psi\) does, so its support lies in the compact set \(\overline{B_{R + 1}}\) however \(f\) behaves far away. Hence \(g \in C_0^2( \mathbb{R}^m )\). On the open ball \(B_R\) the factor \(\psi\) is identically \(1\), so \(g\) and \(f\) coincide there together with all their first and second derivatives, and therefore \(L g = L f\) throughout \(B_R\).

Transfer.
The first exit time is a stopping time by the first exit theorem, and \(E^x[ \tau ] \lt \infty\) by hypothesis, so Dynkin's formula applies to \(g\):

\[ E^x \bigl[ g( X_\tau ) \bigr] = g( x ) + E^x \Bigl[ \int_0^\tau A g( X_s )\, ds \Bigr] . \]

Every quantity in this display is unchanged when \(g\) is replaced by \(f\). The starting point \(x\) lies in \(U \subseteq B_R\), so \(g(x) = f(x)\). The stopped position lies in \(\overline{U} \subseteq B_R\), so \(g( X_\tau ) = f( X_\tau )\) pointwise in \(\omega\). For \(s \leq \tau\) the position \(X_s\) lies in \(B_R\), where \(A g = L g = L f\), the first equality by the generator theorem applied to \(g \in C_0^2\) and the second by the previous step. Substituting gives the display of the theorem.

The exchange is a fair one. What has been given up is generality in the stopping time, which is now required to be an exit time from a bounded region rather than an arbitrary integrable stopping time. What has been gained is that \(f\) may be any twice continuously differentiable function whatsoever. For the questions this track will ask, that is exactly the right trade. The duration of a stay inside a region, and the position at which it ends, are questions whose stopping time is an exit time by construction and whose test functions are not compactly supported.

One hypothesis remains unexamined. Nothing so far guarantees that \(E^x[ \tau ] \lt \infty\) for the exit time from a bounded region, and it has been assumed rather than proved at every appearance. The next section shows, in the case that matters most, that the formula proves it as a by-product rather than requiring it as an input.

Exit Times, Recurrence, and Polar Points

Here is a question the track has been able to pose since stopping times were introduced and unable to answer. Start Brownian motion at a point inside a ball. How long, on average, before it leaves? The quantity is manifestly well defined and there has been no procedure for computing it. Dynkin's formula supplies one, and the computation is short enough to be worth following in full.

Take the driving motion and the state to have the same number \(n\) of components, and let the equation be \(d X_t = d \mathbf{w}_t\), so that the diffusion started at \(a\) is Brownian motion \(a + \mathbf{w}\). Fix \(R \gt 0\) with \(| a | \lt R\), and let

\[ K = \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n : | x | \lt R \} , \quad \tau = \inf \{ t \geq 0 : a + \mathbf{w}_t \notin K \} . \]

Theorem: Mean Exit Time from a Ball

With \(K\), \(\tau\) and \(a\) as above, \(\tau\) is almost surely finite and

\[ E^a[ \tau ] = \frac{ R^2 - | a |^2 }{ n } . \]

Proof.

A bounded truncation.
The set \(K\) is open, so \(\tau\) is a stopping time. A constant time \(k\) is one as well, since \(\{ k \leq t \}\) is \(\Omega\) when \(k \leq t\) and empty otherwise, and both lie in every \(\mathcal{F}_t^{(n)}\). The calculus of stopping times then makes \(\theta_k = \tau \wedge k\) a stopping time for each positive integer \(k\), and \(E^a[ \theta_k ] \leq k\) is finite. Dynkin's formula may therefore be applied to \(\theta_k\) even though nothing is yet known about \(\tau\).

A test function equal to the squared radius.
Let \(\psi\) be the smooth bump function with radii \(R\) and \(R + 1\), and set \(f( x ) = \psi( x ) | x |^2\). Then \(f \in C_0^2\), and \(f( x ) = | x |^2\) whenever \(| x | \leq R\). On the open ball the derivatives of \(f\) up to second order are those of the squared radius, and by continuity of those derivatives the same holds on the closed ball. The generator of Brownian motion, half the Laplacian, therefore gives

\[ A f( x ) = \tfrac{1}{2} \Delta | x |^2 = \tfrac{1}{2} \cdot 2 n = n , \quad | x | \leq R . \]

The path is confined until it stops.
For \(s \lt \tau\) the definition of \(\tau\) gives \(| a + \mathbf{w}_s | \lt R\), and continuity of the path gives \(| a + \mathbf{w}_\tau | \leq R\) on \(\{ \tau \lt \infty \}\). Since \(\theta_k \leq \tau\), every position visited up to time \(\theta_k\) satisfies \(| a + \mathbf{w}_s | \leq R\). Hence \(A f\) equals the constant \(n\) all along the stopped path, and \(f\) equals the squared radius at its endpoints.

The formula, and a uniform bound.
Dynkin's formula applied to \(f\) and \(\theta_k\) reads

\[ \begin{align*} E^a \bigl[ | a + \mathbf{w}_{\theta_k} |^2 \bigr] &= | a |^2 + E^a \Bigl[ \int_0^{\theta_k} n \, ds \Bigr] \\\\ &= | a |^2 + n\, E^a[ \theta_k ] . \end{align*} \]

The left side is at most \(R^2\), because the stopped position lies in the closed ball. Therefore \(E^a[ \theta_k ] \leq ( R^2 - | a |^2 ) / n\) for every \(k\), a bound that does not depend on \(k\).

Releasing the truncation.
The times \(\theta_k\) rise to \(\tau\) at every \(\omega\), so monotone convergence gives \(E^a[ \tau ] = \lim_k E^a[ \theta_k ]\), which the uniform bound keeps finite. In particular \(\tau\) is almost surely finite, so at almost every \(\omega\) one has \(\theta_k = \tau\) for all large \(k\), and the stopped position converges almost surely to \(a + \mathbf{w}_\tau\). That position satisfies \(| a + \mathbf{w}_\tau | = R\): at most \(R\) by the confinement step, and at least \(R\) because the exit position lies outside \(K\), the second half of the first exit theorem. The left side of the display is bounded by \(R^2\), so dominated convergence sends it to \(R^2\). Passing to the limit on both sides gives \[ R^2 = | a |^2 + n\, E^a[ \tau ] , \] which rearranges to the value stated in the theorem.

Three features of the answer are worth reading off, and the computation delivered them without being aimed at any of them. The mean exit time depends on the starting point only through its distance from the center, which the rotational symmetry of Brownian motion makes plausible but which nothing in the computation assumed. It scales as the square of the radius, the signature of a process whose displacement grows like the square root of elapsed time. And it decreases as the dimension grows. A ball of fixed radius is left sooner in higher dimensions, because every additional component contributes its own independent wandering to the radius while the radius to be reached stays where it was.

The hypothesis that would not go away has also been disposed of. Both formulas above carried the requirement that the stopping time have finite mean, and here that requirement was never assumed. Finite mean was obtained instead, from a bound the formula itself produced on the truncations, and the exact value came out of the same limit. The pattern is worth keeping. Applied to a bounded truncation of a stopping time one knows nothing about, Dynkin's formula frequently returns the integrability that its own hypotheses demand.

Which Sphere Comes First

The same device answers a second question, and in answering it pays a debt the track has carried since the Bessel process. Start Brownian motion between two concentric spheres. Which of them does it reach first? The functions that answer this are the logarithm and the powers of the radius, the very functions that compact support could not accommodate, and the bounded-region form of the formula takes them without complaint once they are smoothed inside the inner sphere.

Keep the setting above, Brownian motion \(a + \mathbf{w}\) in \(\mathbb{R}^n\), now with \(a \neq 0\), and write \(P^a\) for the probability that accompanies \(E^a\), so that \(P^a[ F ] = E^a[ \mathbf{1}_F ]\). For \(0 \lt r \lt | a |\) and \(R \gt | a |\), consider the first time the path enters the closed ball of radius \(r\), the first time it leaves the open ball of radius \(R\), and the first time it visits the origin,

\[ \begin{align*} T_r &= \inf \{ t \geq 0 : | a + \mathbf{w}_t | \leq r \} , \\\\ \tau_R &= \inf \{ t \geq 0 : | a + \mathbf{w}_t | \geq R \} , \\\\ T_0 &= \inf \{ t \geq 0 : a + \mathbf{w}_t = 0 \} . \end{align*} \]

Each is the first exit time from an open set, namely \(\{ x : | x | \gt r \}\), the open ball of radius \(R\), and \(\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{ 0 \}\), so each is a stopping time, and \(\tau_R\) is the time \(\tau\) of the previous theorem with its radius made explicit. The comparison between the two spheres is carried by the function

\[ \varphi_n( \rho ) = \begin{cases} \rho , & n = 1 , \\ \log \rho , & n = 2 , \\ \rho^{2 - n} , & n \geq 3 , \end{cases} \quad \rho \gt 0 . \]

Theorem: Exit Probabilities from an Annulus

Let \(a + \mathbf{w}\) be Brownian motion in \(\mathbb{R}^n\), \(n \geq 1\), started at \(a\), let \(0 \lt r \lt | a | \lt R\), let \(T_r\) and \(\tau_R\) be the first times at which \(| a + \mathbf{w}_t | \leq r\) and \(| a + \mathbf{w}_t | \geq R\), and let \(\varphi_n( \rho )\) be \(\rho\), \(\log \rho\) or \(\rho^{2 - n}\) according as \(n = 1\), \(n = 2\) or \(n \geq 3\). Let \(\tau_U\) be the first exit time of \(a + \mathbf{w}\) from the annulus \(U = \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n : r \lt | x | \lt R \}\). Then \(\tau_U = T_r \wedge \tau_R\) and \(E^a[ \tau_U ] \lt \infty\), so \(\tau_U\) is almost surely finite, and

\[ P^a[ T_r \lt \tau_R ] = \frac{ \varphi_n( R ) - \varphi_n( | a | ) } { \varphi_n( R ) - \varphi_n( r ) } . \]

Proof.

The annulus.
The annulus \(U\) is open, bounded, and contains \(a\). A path leaves \(U\) exactly when it enters \(\{ | x | \leq r \}\) or \(\{ | x | \geq R \}\), so the first exit time from \(U\) is the smaller of the two entrance times, \(\tau_U = T_r \wedge \tau_R\). A point outside the open ball of radius \(R\) lies outside \(U\), so \(\tau_U \leq \tau_R\) at every \(\omega\), and the mean exit time from a ball gives

\[ E^a[ \tau_U ] \leq E^a[ \tau_R ] = \frac{ R^2 - | a |^2 }{ n } . \]

Hence \(\tau_U\) has finite mean and is almost surely finite.

Where the path leaves.
On \(\{ \tau_U \lt \infty \}\) the path lies in \(U\) before \(\tau_U\), so continuity gives \(r \leq | a + \mathbf{w}_{\tau_U} | \leq R\). If \(T_r \lt \tau_R\), then \(\tau_U = T_r\), and the exit position from \(\{ | x | \gt r \}\) has radius at most \(r\) by the first exit theorem, hence exactly \(r\). If \(\tau_R \leq T_r\), then \(\tau_U = \tau_R\), and the exit position from the open ball has radius at least \(R\), hence exactly \(R\). The two times never coincide on \(\{ \tau_U \lt \infty \}\), since no point has radius both at most \(r\) and at least \(R\). Almost surely, therefore, \(| a + \mathbf{w}_{\tau_U} | = r\) on \(\{ T_r \lt \tau_R \}\) and \(| a + \mathbf{w}_{\tau_U} | = R\) off it.

A test function harmonic off the origin.
For \(x \neq 0\) put \(g( x ) = \varphi_n( | x | )\). The radius is smooth away from the origin, so \(g\) is smooth on \(\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{ 0 \}\), with \(\partial_i g = \varphi_n'( | x | )\, x_i / | x |\). Differentiating once more and summing over \(i\),

\[ \begin{align*} \partial_{ii} g &= \varphi_n''( | x | ) \frac{ x_i^2 }{ | x |^2 } + \varphi_n'( | x | ) \Bigl( \frac{ 1 }{ | x | } - \frac{ x_i^2 }{ | x |^3 } \Bigr) , \\\\ \Delta g &= \varphi_n''( | x | ) + \frac{ n - 1 }{ | x | }\, \varphi_n'( | x | ) . \end{align*} \]

The last expression vanishes in every case. For \(n = 1\) both terms are zero. For \(n = 2\) it is \(- \rho^{-2} + \rho^{-1} \cdot \rho^{-1} = 0\), and for \(n \geq 3\) it is \(( 2 - n )( 1 - n ) \rho^{-n} + ( n - 1 )( 2 - n ) \rho^{-n} = 0\), with \(\rho = | x |\).

The function \(g\) is undefined at the origin, so it is cut off there. Let \(\psi\) be the smooth bump function with radii \(r/4\) and \(r/2\), and put \(f = ( 1 - \psi )\, g\) away from the origin and \(f( 0 ) = 0\). On the open ball of radius \(r/4\) the factor \(1 - \psi\) vanishes, so \(f\) is identically zero there. Away from the origin \(f\) is a product of smooth functions. Hence \(f \in C^2( \mathbb{R}^n )\). Where \(| x | \geq r/2\) the factor \(\psi\) vanishes, so \(f = g\) on the open set \(\{ | x | \gt r/2 \}\), which contains the closed annulus \(\overline{U} = \{ r \leq | x | \leq R \}\). With drift zero and noise coefficient the identity, the differential operator of the diffusion is \(L = \tfrac{1}{2} \Delta\), so \(L f = \tfrac{1}{2} \Delta g = 0\) throughout \(\overline{U}\).

The formula.
The set \(U\) is open and bounded, it contains \(a\), and \(E^a[ \tau_U ] \lt \infty\), so Dynkin's formula on a bounded region applies to \(f\). Up to time \(\tau_U\) the path stays in \(\overline{U}\), where \(L f = 0\), so the integral term vanishes and

\[ E^a \bigl[ f( a + \mathbf{w}_{\tau_U} ) \bigr] = f( a ) = \varphi_n( | a | ) . \]

By the previous steps \(f( a + \mathbf{w}_{\tau_U} )\) equals \(\varphi_n( r )\) on \(\{ T_r \lt \tau_R \}\) and \(\varphi_n( R )\) off it, almost surely. Writing \(p = P^a[ T_r \lt \tau_R ]\), the left side is

\[ p\, \varphi_n( r ) + ( 1 - p )\, \varphi_n( R ) = \varphi_n( | a | ) . \]

The function \(\varphi_n\) is strictly increasing for \(n \leq 2\) and strictly decreasing for \(n \geq 3\), so \(\varphi_n( r ) \neq \varphi_n( R )\), and solving for \(p\) gives the stated value.

The outer sphere may now be sent to infinity, and the inner one shrunk to a point. What survives each limit depends on the dimension, and the dependence is sharp.

Corollary: Recurrence, Transience, and Polar Points

Let \(a + \mathbf{w}\) be Brownian motion in \(\mathbb{R}^n\) started at \(a \neq 0\), and let \(T_r\) and \(T_0\) be the first times at which \(| a + \mathbf{w}_t | \leq r\) and \(a + \mathbf{w}_t = 0\), respectively. Then:

  1. If \(n = 1\), then \(P^a[ T_0 \lt \infty ] = 1\).
  2. If \(n = 2\), then \(P^a[ T_r \lt \infty ] = 1\) for every \(0 \lt r \lt | a |\), while \(P^a[ T_0 \lt \infty ] = 0\).
  3. If \(n \geq 3\), then \(P^a[ T_r \lt \infty ] = ( r / | a | )^{n - 2}\) for every \(0 \lt r \lt | a |\), and \(P^a[ T_0 \lt \infty ] = 0\).
Proof.

The outer sphere recedes.
Fix \(0 \lt r \lt | a |\) and let \(R\) run through the integers exceeding \(| a |\). A larger radius is reached no earlier than a smaller one, so \(\tau_R\) is nondecreasing in \(R\). It also tends to infinity at every \(\omega\). For fixed \(t\) the continuous path is bounded on \([ 0, t ]\), so \(\tau_R \gt t\) once \(R\) exceeds that bound. The events \(\{ T_r \lt \tau_R \}\) therefore increase to \(\{ T_r \lt \infty \}\), and monotone convergence applied to their indicators gives \(P^a[ T_r \lt \infty ] = \lim_{R \to \infty} P^a[ T_r \lt \tau_R ]\). By the theorem, this limit is

\[ \begin{align*} \lim_{R \to \infty} \frac{ R - | a | }{ R - r } &= 1 , \quad n = 1 , \\\\ \lim_{R \to \infty} \frac{ \log R - \log | a | }{ \log R - \log r } &= 1 , \quad n = 2 , \\\\ \lim_{R \to \infty} \frac{ | a |^{2 - n} - R^{2 - n} }{ r^{2 - n} - R^{2 - n} } &= \Bigl( \frac{ r }{ | a | } \Bigr)^{n - 2} , \quad n \geq 3 . \end{align*} \]

This proves the claims about \(T_r\) in parts (2) and (3).

The inner sphere shrinks (\(n \geq 2\)).
Fix an integer \(R \gt | a |\). A path that visits the origin has radius \(0 \leq r\) at that moment, so \(T_r \leq T_0\) for every \(0 \lt r \lt | a |\), and \(\{ T_0 \lt \tau_R \} \subseteq \{ T_r \lt \tau_R \}\). The theorem therefore bounds \(P^a[ T_0 \lt \tau_R ]\) by

\[ \begin{align*} \frac{ \log R - \log | a | }{ \log R - \log r } &\longrightarrow 0 , \quad n = 2 , \\\\ \frac{ | a |^{2 - n} - R^{2 - n} }{ r^{2 - n} - R^{2 - n} } &\longrightarrow 0 , \quad n \geq 3 , \end{align*} \]

as \(r \downarrow 0\), because \(\log r \to - \infty\) and \(r^{2 - n} \to \infty\). Hence \(P^a[ T_0 \lt \tau_R ] = 0\) for every \(R\). As in the first step, the events \(\{ T_0 \lt \tau_R \}\) increase to \(\{ T_0 \lt \infty \}\), so \(P^a[ T_0 \lt \infty ] = 0\).

The line (\(n = 1\)).
Here the inner sphere \(\{ -r, r \}\) never contains the origin, so the start is shifted instead. Let \(s = a / | a | \in \{ -1, 1 \}\), fix \(r \gt 0\), and put \(a' = a + r s\), so that \(| a' | = | a | + r \gt r\). Both \(P^a\) and \(P^{a'}\) are probabilities of events of the one driving motion \(\mathbf{w}\). By the first step, applied at \(a'\), almost every path of \(a' + \mathbf{w}\) enters \([ -r, r ]\) at some time \(t\). At that time

\[ s\, ( a + \mathbf{w}_t ) = s\, ( a' + \mathbf{w}_t ) - r \leq 0 , \]

while \(s\, ( a + \mathbf{w}_0 ) = | a | \gt 0\). The intermediate value theorem, applied to the continuous function \(u \mapsto s\, ( a + \mathbf{w}_u )\) on \([ 0, t ]\), produces a time at which \(a + \mathbf{w}_u = 0\). Hence \(P^a[ T_0 \lt \infty ] = 1\).

The three parts separate what a ball and a point can do. On the line the path reaches the origin with certainty. In the plane it reaches every ball about the origin with certainty, which is recurrence, and yet it never lands on the origin itself. From dimension three on it may escape for good, reaching a small ball only with probability \(( r / | a | )^{n - 2}\), which is transience. The borderline sits exactly at dimension two, where the logarithm replaces the power and the balance between the two spheres tips from certainty to chance.

The statements about \(T_0\) in parts (2) and (3) are together the fact taken on faith in the example of the Bessel process. There the Itô formula on an open domain needed almost every path of Brownian motion started away from the origin to avoid it for all time, in every dimension from two on, and the polarity of points supplies exactly that. Part (1) is the companion fact recorded there for the line, which is why that example excluded dimension one.