Dynkin's Formula
Two results stand ready and have not yet been put in the same sentence.
The
stopped expectation identity
concerns a general Itô process, under hypotheses that the proof
below checks one by one, and a compactly supported \(C^2\) function
evaluated at a stopping time of finite mean. It writes the average of
that function at the stopping time as its initial value plus an
accumulated second-order expression. The
generator theorem
identifies that expression, for a diffusion, as the value of the
generator.
Putting the second inside the first is the formula of this section.
The gain is not computational. Nothing in the resulting statement is
harder or easier to evaluate than what went into it. The gain is that
the coefficients disappear. The identity as first proved speaks of
\(\mathbf{u}\) and the entries of \(\mathbf{v} \mathbf{v}^\top\), which
are features of a particular equation. The formula below speaks only of
\(A\), which is defined from the process alone, with no equation
mentioned. Two equations with the same generator therefore obey the
same formula, and a question about averages can be posed and answered
without ever exhibiting the coefficients that produced the process.
Throughout, the setting is the several-component one in which
the generator was
defined. The state space is \(\mathbb{R}^m\), the driving motion
\(\mathbf{w}\) is an \(n\)-dimensional Brownian motion carrying the
filtration \(\{ \mathcal{F}_t^{(n)} \}\) of the
multi-dimensional Itô integral,
the coefficients are Lipschitz, and \(E^x\) denotes the average over
the diffusion started at \(x\). The diffusion as a family rests on the
several-component reading
as declared there, and nothing on this page reproves it.
Proof.
The diffusion is an Itô process whose coefficients are
\(\mathbf{b}\) and \(\sigma\) read along the path. Its membership
in that class, and the boundedness of the coefficients over the
support of \(f\), were both verified when
the generator was
computed, the latter from continuity on a compact set. With
\(f \in C_0^2( \mathbb{R}^m )\) and \(E^x[ \tau ] \lt \infty\)
assumed, every requirement of the stopped expectation identity is
met, and it gives
\[
E^x \bigl[ f( X_\tau ) \bigr]
= f( x )
+ E^x \Bigl[ \int_0^\tau
\Bigl( \sum_{i} b_i\, \partial_i f
+ \tfrac{1}{2} \sum_{i, l}
\bigl( \sigma \sigma^\top \bigr)_{il}\, \partial_{il} f
\Bigr)( X_s )\, ds \Bigr] .
\]
The generator theorem states that for \(f \in C_0^2\) the bracketed
expression equals \(A f\) at every point of \(\mathbb{R}^m\), so the
two integrands agree at every \(( s, \omega )\), and the displays
are the same statement written twice.
The hypotheses are worth separating by the work they do. Compact
support is what makes the identity applicable at all. Together with the
continuity of the coefficients, it bounds the integrands and so secures
the class membership that Itô's formula demands of them.
Finiteness of \(E^x[ \tau ]\) is what makes the stopping time usable.
It forces \(\tau\) to be finite almost surely, so that \(X_\tau\)
exists, bounds the accumulated integral by a constant multiple of the
integrable variable \(\tau\), and meets the square-integrability
hypothesis under which the noise term averages to zero.
Of the two hypotheses, the first restricts \(f\) and the second
restricts \(\tau\). The next section trades the one for the other.
Compact support is dropped there, at the cost of specializing the
stopping time to an exit time.
Considerably more general versions of the formula exist, in which
\(f\) is required only to be sufficiently regular near the range of the
stopped path and the stopping time is controlled by weaker means. They
belong to a theory of Markov processes broader than the one this track
develops, and nothing here will need them.
Beyond Compact Support
Compact support is an awkward hypothesis in practice, because the
functions one wants to feed to the formula are rarely compactly
supported. The squared distance to the origin is not, and neither is a
logarithm or a power of the radius. These are exactly the functions
whose behavior under a diffusion one wants to know. The hypothesis is
also visibly stronger than the situation requires. If the stopping time
is the moment the path first leaves a bounded region, then the path
never visits anything outside that region before being stopped, and the
values of \(f\) far away cannot possibly matter.
Turning that observation into a proof costs one construction. Replace
\(f\) by a compactly supported function agreeing with it near the
region, apply the formula already proved, and observe that neither side
can tell the two functions apart.
The operator appearing in the conclusion is then the
differential operator of the diffusion,
which is defined for every twice continuously differentiable \(f\) and
agrees with \(A\) on \(C_0^2( \mathbb{R}^m )\). Stating the conclusion
with \(L\) rather than \(A\) is not fussiness. For a general
\(f \in C^2\) the limit defining \(A f\) need not exist, since the
averages \(E^x[ f( X_t ) ]\) need not even be finite.
Theorem: Dynkin's Formula on a Bounded Region
Let \(X\) be an Itô diffusion in \(\mathbb{R}^m\), let
\(U \subseteq \mathbb{R}^m\) be open and bounded, let
\(x \in U\), and let \(\tau\) be the
first exit time
of \(X\) from \(U\), assumed to satisfy
\(E^x[ \tau ] \lt \infty\). Then for every
\(f \in C^2( \mathbb{R}^m )\),
\[
E^x \bigl[ f( X_\tau ) \bigr]
= f( x )
+ E^x \Bigl[ \int_0^\tau L f( X_s )\, ds \Bigr] .
\]
Proof.
The stopped path stays in the closure.
For \(s \lt \tau( \omega )\) the definition of the first exit time
gives \(X_s( \omega ) \in U\). The time \(\tau( \omega )\) is
positive, because the path starts in the open set \(U\), and it is
finite almost surely, because \(E^x[ \tau ]\) is. At
\(s = \tau( \omega )\) continuity of the path therefore makes
\(X_\tau\) a limit of points of \(U\), so
\(X_\tau \in \overline{U}\). Hence the whole stopped path lies in
\(\overline{U}\), a compact set since \(U\) is bounded.
A compactly supported twin.
Since \(U\) is bounded, there is an \(R\) with \(\overline{U}\)
contained in the open ball \(B_R\) of radius \(R\) about the
origin. The
smooth bump function
with radii \(R\) and \(R + 1\) is a smooth
\(\psi : \mathbb{R}^m \to \mathbb{R}\) equal to \(1\) on
\(\overline{B_R}\) and vanishing outside \(B_{R + 1}\). Put
\(g = \psi f\). A product of a smooth function with a \(C^2\) one
is \(C^2\), and \(g\) vanishes wherever \(\psi\) does, so its
support lies in the compact set \(\overline{B_{R + 1}}\) however
\(f\) behaves far away. Hence \(g \in C_0^2( \mathbb{R}^m )\). On
the open ball \(B_R\) the factor \(\psi\) is identically \(1\), so
\(g\) and \(f\) coincide there together with all their first and
second derivatives, and therefore \(L g = L f\) throughout \(B_R\).
Transfer.
The first exit time is a stopping time by the
first exit theorem,
and \(E^x[ \tau ] \lt \infty\) by hypothesis, so
Dynkin's formula
applies to \(g\):
\[
E^x \bigl[ g( X_\tau ) \bigr]
= g( x )
+ E^x \Bigl[ \int_0^\tau A g( X_s )\, ds \Bigr] .
\]
Every quantity in this display is unchanged when \(g\) is replaced
by \(f\). The starting point \(x\) lies in \(U \subseteq B_R\), so
\(g(x) = f(x)\). The stopped position lies in
\(\overline{U} \subseteq B_R\), so
\(g( X_\tau ) = f( X_\tau )\) pointwise in \(\omega\). For
\(s \leq \tau\) the position \(X_s\) lies in \(B_R\), where
\(A g = L g = L f\), the first equality by the
generator theorem
applied to \(g \in C_0^2\) and the second by the previous step.
Substituting gives the display of the theorem.
The exchange is a fair one. What has been given up is generality in
the stopping time, which is now required to be an exit time from a
bounded region rather than an arbitrary integrable stopping time. What
has been gained is that \(f\) may be any twice continuously
differentiable function whatsoever. For the questions this track will
ask, that is exactly the right trade. The duration of a stay inside a
region, and the position at which it ends, are questions whose
stopping time is an exit time by construction and whose test functions
are not compactly supported.
One hypothesis remains unexamined. Nothing so far guarantees that
\(E^x[ \tau ] \lt \infty\) for the exit time from a bounded region, and
it has been assumed rather than proved at every appearance. The next
section shows, in the case that matters most, that the formula proves
it as a by-product rather than requiring it as an input.
Exit Times, Recurrence, and Polar Points
Here is a question the track has been able to pose since stopping times
were introduced and unable to answer. Start Brownian motion at a point
inside a ball. How long, on average, before it leaves? The quantity is
manifestly well defined and there has been no procedure for computing
it. Dynkin's formula supplies one, and the computation is short enough
to be worth following in full.
Take the driving motion and the state to have the same number \(n\) of
components, and let the equation be \(d X_t = d \mathbf{w}_t\), so that
the diffusion started at \(a\) is Brownian motion \(a + \mathbf{w}\).
Fix \(R \gt 0\) with \(| a | \lt R\), and let
\[
K = \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n : | x | \lt R \} ,
\quad
\tau = \inf \{ t \geq 0 : a + \mathbf{w}_t \notin K \} .
\]
Theorem: Mean Exit Time from a Ball
With \(K\), \(\tau\) and \(a\) as above, \(\tau\) is almost
surely finite and
\[
E^a[ \tau ] = \frac{ R^2 - | a |^2 }{ n } .
\]
Proof.
A bounded truncation.
The set \(K\) is open, so \(\tau\) is a
stopping time.
A constant time \(k\) is one as well, since \(\{ k \leq t \}\) is
\(\Omega\) when \(k \leq t\) and empty otherwise, and both lie in
every \(\mathcal{F}_t^{(n)}\). The
calculus of stopping times
then makes \(\theta_k = \tau \wedge k\) a stopping time for each
positive integer \(k\), and \(E^a[ \theta_k ] \leq k\) is finite.
Dynkin's formula may therefore be applied to \(\theta_k\) even
though nothing is yet known about \(\tau\).
A test function equal to the squared radius.
Let \(\psi\) be the
smooth bump function
with radii \(R\) and \(R + 1\), and set
\(f( x ) = \psi( x ) | x |^2\). Then \(f \in C_0^2\), and
\(f( x ) = | x |^2\) whenever \(| x | \leq R\). On the open ball
the derivatives of \(f\) up to second order are those of the
squared radius, and by continuity of those derivatives the same
holds on the closed ball. The
generator of
Brownian motion, half the Laplacian, therefore gives
\[
A f( x ) = \tfrac{1}{2} \Delta | x |^2 = \tfrac{1}{2} \cdot 2 n = n ,
\quad | x | \leq R .
\]
The path is confined until it stops.
For \(s \lt \tau\) the definition of \(\tau\) gives
\(| a + \mathbf{w}_s | \lt R\), and continuity of the path gives
\(| a + \mathbf{w}_\tau | \leq R\) on \(\{ \tau \lt \infty \}\).
Since \(\theta_k \leq \tau\), every position visited up to time
\(\theta_k\) satisfies \(| a + \mathbf{w}_s | \leq R\). Hence
\(A f\) equals the constant \(n\) all along the stopped path, and
\(f\) equals the squared radius at its endpoints.
The formula, and a uniform bound.
Dynkin's formula
applied to \(f\) and \(\theta_k\) reads
\[
\begin{align*}
E^a \bigl[ | a + \mathbf{w}_{\theta_k} |^2 \bigr]
&= | a |^2 + E^a \Bigl[ \int_0^{\theta_k} n \, ds \Bigr] \\\\
&= | a |^2 + n\, E^a[ \theta_k ] .
\end{align*}
\]
The left side is at most \(R^2\), because the stopped position
lies in the closed ball. Therefore
\(E^a[ \theta_k ] \leq ( R^2 - | a |^2 ) / n\) for every \(k\),
a bound that does not depend on \(k\).
Releasing the truncation.
The times \(\theta_k\) rise to \(\tau\) at every \(\omega\), so
monotone convergence
gives \(E^a[ \tau ] = \lim_k E^a[ \theta_k ]\), which the uniform
bound keeps finite. In particular \(\tau\) is almost surely finite,
so at almost every \(\omega\) one has \(\theta_k = \tau\) for all
large \(k\), and the stopped position converges almost surely to
\(a + \mathbf{w}_\tau\). That position satisfies
\(| a + \mathbf{w}_\tau | = R\): at most \(R\) by the confinement
step, and at least \(R\) because the exit position lies outside
\(K\), the second half of the first exit theorem. The left side of
the display is bounded by \(R^2\), so
dominated convergence
sends it to \(R^2\). Passing to the limit on both sides gives
\[
R^2 = | a |^2 + n\, E^a[ \tau ] ,
\]
which rearranges to the value stated in the theorem.
Three features of the answer are worth reading off, and the computation
delivered them without being aimed at any of them. The mean exit time
depends on the starting point only through its distance from the
center, which the rotational symmetry of Brownian motion makes
plausible but which nothing in the computation assumed. It scales as
the square of the radius, the signature of a process whose displacement
grows like the square root of elapsed time. And it decreases as the
dimension grows. A ball of fixed radius is left sooner in higher
dimensions, because every additional component contributes its own
independent wandering to the radius while the radius to be reached
stays where it was.
The hypothesis that would not go away has also been disposed of. Both
formulas above carried the requirement that the stopping time have
finite mean, and here that requirement was never assumed. Finite mean
was obtained instead, from a bound the formula itself produced on the
truncations, and the exact value came out of the same limit. The
pattern is worth keeping. Applied to a bounded truncation of a stopping
time one knows nothing about, Dynkin's formula frequently returns the
integrability that its own hypotheses demand.
Which Sphere Comes First
The same device answers a second question, and in answering it pays
a debt the track has carried since the
Bessel process.
Start Brownian motion between two concentric spheres. Which of them
does it reach first? The functions that answer this are the logarithm
and the powers of the radius, the very functions that compact support
could not accommodate, and the bounded-region form of the formula
takes them without complaint once they are smoothed inside the inner
sphere.
Keep the setting above, Brownian motion \(a + \mathbf{w}\) in
\(\mathbb{R}^n\), now with \(a \neq 0\), and write \(P^a\) for the
probability that accompanies \(E^a\), so that
\(P^a[ F ] = E^a[ \mathbf{1}_F ]\). For \(0 \lt r \lt | a |\) and
\(R \gt | a |\), consider the first time the path enters the closed
ball of radius \(r\), the first time it leaves the open ball of radius
\(R\), and the first time it visits the origin,
\[
\begin{align*}
T_r &= \inf \{ t \geq 0 : | a + \mathbf{w}_t | \leq r \} , \\\\
\tau_R &= \inf \{ t \geq 0 : | a + \mathbf{w}_t | \geq R \} , \\\\
T_0 &= \inf \{ t \geq 0 : a + \mathbf{w}_t = 0 \} .
\end{align*}
\]
Each is the first exit time from an open set, namely
\(\{ x : | x | \gt r \}\), the open ball of radius \(R\), and
\(\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{ 0 \}\), so each is a
stopping time,
and \(\tau_R\) is the time \(\tau\) of the previous theorem with its
radius made explicit. The comparison between the two spheres is
carried by the function
\[
\varphi_n( \rho ) =
\begin{cases}
\rho , & n = 1 , \\
\log \rho , & n = 2 , \\
\rho^{2 - n} , & n \geq 3 ,
\end{cases}
\quad \rho \gt 0 .
\]
Theorem: Exit Probabilities from an Annulus
Let \(a + \mathbf{w}\) be Brownian motion in \(\mathbb{R}^n\),
\(n \geq 1\), started at \(a\), let \(0 \lt r \lt | a | \lt R\),
let \(T_r\) and \(\tau_R\) be the first times at which
\(| a + \mathbf{w}_t | \leq r\) and \(| a + \mathbf{w}_t | \geq R\),
and let \(\varphi_n( \rho )\) be \(\rho\), \(\log \rho\) or
\(\rho^{2 - n}\) according as \(n = 1\), \(n = 2\) or
\(n \geq 3\). Let \(\tau_U\) be the first exit time
of \(a + \mathbf{w}\) from the annulus
\(U = \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n : r \lt | x | \lt R \}\). Then
\(\tau_U = T_r \wedge \tau_R\) and \(E^a[ \tau_U ] \lt \infty\),
so \(\tau_U\) is almost surely finite, and
\[
P^a[ T_r \lt \tau_R ]
= \frac{ \varphi_n( R ) - \varphi_n( | a | ) }
{ \varphi_n( R ) - \varphi_n( r ) } .
\]
Proof.
The annulus.
The annulus \(U\) is open, bounded, and contains \(a\). A path
leaves \(U\) exactly when it enters \(\{ | x | \leq r \}\) or
\(\{ | x | \geq R \}\), so the first exit time from \(U\) is the
smaller of the two entrance times, \(\tau_U = T_r \wedge \tau_R\).
A point outside the open ball of radius \(R\) lies outside \(U\), so \(\tau_U \leq \tau_R\) at every \(\omega\), and the
mean exit time from a ball
gives
\[
E^a[ \tau_U ] \leq E^a[ \tau_R ] = \frac{ R^2 - | a |^2 }{ n } .
\]
Hence \(\tau_U\) has finite mean and is almost surely finite.
Where the path leaves.
On \(\{ \tau_U \lt \infty \}\) the path lies in \(U\) before
\(\tau_U\), so continuity gives
\(r \leq | a + \mathbf{w}_{\tau_U} | \leq R\). If
\(T_r \lt \tau_R\), then \(\tau_U = T_r\), and the exit position
from \(\{ | x | \gt r \}\) has radius at most \(r\) by the first
exit theorem, hence exactly \(r\). If \(\tau_R \leq T_r\), then
\(\tau_U = \tau_R\), and the exit position from the open ball has
radius at least \(R\), hence exactly \(R\). The two times never
coincide on \(\{ \tau_U \lt \infty \}\), since no point has radius
both at most \(r\) and at least \(R\). Almost surely, therefore,
\(| a + \mathbf{w}_{\tau_U} | = r\) on \(\{ T_r \lt \tau_R \}\) and
\(| a + \mathbf{w}_{\tau_U} | = R\) off it.
A test function harmonic off the origin.
For \(x \neq 0\) put \(g( x ) = \varphi_n( | x | )\). The radius is
smooth away from the origin, so \(g\) is smooth on
\(\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{ 0 \}\), with
\(\partial_i g = \varphi_n'( | x | )\, x_i / | x |\).
Differentiating once more and summing over \(i\),
\[
\begin{align*}
\partial_{ii} g
&= \varphi_n''( | x | ) \frac{ x_i^2 }{ | x |^2 }
+ \varphi_n'( | x | ) \Bigl( \frac{ 1 }{ | x | } - \frac{ x_i^2 }{ | x |^3 } \Bigr) , \\\\
\Delta g
&= \varphi_n''( | x | ) + \frac{ n - 1 }{ | x | }\, \varphi_n'( | x | ) .
\end{align*}
\]
The last expression vanishes in every case. For \(n = 1\) both
terms are zero. For \(n = 2\) it is
\(- \rho^{-2} + \rho^{-1} \cdot \rho^{-1} = 0\), and for
\(n \geq 3\) it is
\(( 2 - n )( 1 - n ) \rho^{-n} + ( n - 1 )( 2 - n ) \rho^{-n} = 0\),
with \(\rho = | x |\).
The function \(g\) is undefined at the origin, so it is cut off
there. Let \(\psi\) be the
smooth bump function
with radii \(r/4\) and \(r/2\), and put \(f = ( 1 - \psi )\, g\) away
from the origin and \(f( 0 ) = 0\). On the open ball of radius
\(r/4\) the factor \(1 - \psi\) vanishes, so \(f\) is identically zero
there. Away from the origin \(f\) is a product of smooth functions.
Hence \(f \in C^2( \mathbb{R}^n )\). Where \(| x | \geq r/2\) the
factor \(\psi\) vanishes, so \(f = g\) on the open set
\(\{ | x | \gt r/2 \}\), which contains the closed annulus
\(\overline{U} = \{ r \leq | x | \leq R \}\). With drift zero and
noise coefficient the identity, the
differential operator of the diffusion
is \(L = \tfrac{1}{2} \Delta\), so \(L f = \tfrac{1}{2} \Delta g = 0\)
throughout \(\overline{U}\).
The formula.
The set \(U\) is open and bounded, it contains \(a\), and
\(E^a[ \tau_U ] \lt \infty\), so
Dynkin's formula on a bounded region
applies to \(f\). Up to time \(\tau_U\) the path stays in
\(\overline{U}\), where \(L f = 0\), so the integral term vanishes
and
\[
E^a \bigl[ f( a + \mathbf{w}_{\tau_U} ) \bigr] = f( a ) = \varphi_n( | a | ) .
\]
By the previous steps \(f( a + \mathbf{w}_{\tau_U} )\) equals
\(\varphi_n( r )\) on \(\{ T_r \lt \tau_R \}\) and
\(\varphi_n( R )\) off it, almost surely. Writing
\(p = P^a[ T_r \lt \tau_R ]\), the left side is
\[
p\, \varphi_n( r ) + ( 1 - p )\, \varphi_n( R ) = \varphi_n( | a | ) .
\]
The function \(\varphi_n\) is strictly increasing for
\(n \leq 2\) and strictly decreasing for \(n \geq 3\), so
\(\varphi_n( r ) \neq \varphi_n( R )\), and solving for \(p\) gives
the stated value.
The outer sphere may now be sent to infinity, and the inner one shrunk
to a point. What survives each limit depends on the dimension, and
the dependence is sharp.
Corollary: Recurrence, Transience, and Polar Points
Let \(a + \mathbf{w}\) be Brownian motion in \(\mathbb{R}^n\)
started at \(a \neq 0\), and let \(T_r\) and \(T_0\) be the first
times at which \(| a + \mathbf{w}_t | \leq r\) and
\(a + \mathbf{w}_t = 0\), respectively. Then:
-
If \(n = 1\), then \(P^a[ T_0 \lt \infty ] = 1\).
-
If \(n = 2\), then \(P^a[ T_r \lt \infty ] = 1\) for every
\(0 \lt r \lt | a |\), while \(P^a[ T_0 \lt \infty ] = 0\).
-
If \(n \geq 3\), then
\(P^a[ T_r \lt \infty ] = ( r / | a | )^{n - 2}\) for every
\(0 \lt r \lt | a |\), and \(P^a[ T_0 \lt \infty ] = 0\).
Proof.
The outer sphere recedes.
Fix \(0 \lt r \lt | a |\) and let \(R\) run through the integers
exceeding \(| a |\). A larger radius is reached no earlier than a
smaller one, so \(\tau_R\) is nondecreasing in \(R\). It also tends
to infinity at every \(\omega\). For fixed \(t\) the continuous path
is bounded on \([ 0, t ]\), so \(\tau_R \gt t\) once \(R\) exceeds
that bound. The events \(\{ T_r \lt \tau_R \}\) therefore increase
to \(\{ T_r \lt \infty \}\), and
monotone convergence
applied to their indicators gives
\(P^a[ T_r \lt \infty ] = \lim_{R \to \infty} P^a[ T_r \lt \tau_R ]\).
By the theorem, this limit is
\[
\begin{align*}
\lim_{R \to \infty} \frac{ R - | a | }{ R - r } &= 1 , \quad n = 1 , \\\\
\lim_{R \to \infty} \frac{ \log R - \log | a | }{ \log R - \log r } &= 1 , \quad n = 2 , \\\\
\lim_{R \to \infty} \frac{ | a |^{2 - n} - R^{2 - n} }{ r^{2 - n} - R^{2 - n} }
&= \Bigl( \frac{ r }{ | a | } \Bigr)^{n - 2} , \quad n \geq 3 .
\end{align*}
\]
This proves the claims about \(T_r\) in parts (2) and (3).
The inner sphere shrinks (\(n \geq 2\)).
Fix an integer \(R \gt | a |\). A path that visits the origin has
radius \(0 \leq r\) at that moment, so \(T_r \leq T_0\) for every
\(0 \lt r \lt | a |\), and
\(\{ T_0 \lt \tau_R \} \subseteq \{ T_r \lt \tau_R \}\). The
theorem therefore bounds \(P^a[ T_0 \lt \tau_R ]\) by
\[
\begin{align*}
\frac{ \log R - \log | a | }{ \log R - \log r } &\longrightarrow 0 , \quad n = 2 , \\\\
\frac{ | a |^{2 - n} - R^{2 - n} }{ r^{2 - n} - R^{2 - n} } &\longrightarrow 0 , \quad n \geq 3 ,
\end{align*}
\]
as \(r \downarrow 0\), because \(\log r \to - \infty\) and
\(r^{2 - n} \to \infty\). Hence
\(P^a[ T_0 \lt \tau_R ] = 0\) for every \(R\). As in the first step,
the events \(\{ T_0 \lt \tau_R \}\) increase to
\(\{ T_0 \lt \infty \}\), so \(P^a[ T_0 \lt \infty ] = 0\).
The line (\(n = 1\)).
Here the inner sphere \(\{ -r, r \}\) never contains the origin, so
the start is shifted instead. Let \(s = a / | a | \in \{ -1, 1 \}\),
fix \(r \gt 0\), and put \(a' = a + r s\), so that
\(| a' | = | a | + r \gt r\). Both \(P^a\) and \(P^{a'}\) are
probabilities of events of the one driving motion \(\mathbf{w}\).
By the first step, applied at \(a'\), almost every path of
\(a' + \mathbf{w}\) enters \([ -r, r ]\) at some time \(t\). At that
time
\[
s\, ( a + \mathbf{w}_t ) = s\, ( a' + \mathbf{w}_t ) - r \leq 0 ,
\]
while \(s\, ( a + \mathbf{w}_0 ) = | a | \gt 0\). The intermediate
value theorem, applied to the continuous function
\(u \mapsto s\, ( a + \mathbf{w}_u )\) on \([ 0, t ]\), produces a
time at which \(a + \mathbf{w}_u = 0\). Hence
\(P^a[ T_0 \lt \infty ] = 1\).
The three parts separate what a ball and a point can do. On the line
the path reaches the origin with certainty. In the plane it reaches
every ball about the origin with certainty, which is recurrence,
and yet it never lands on the origin itself. From dimension three on
it may escape for good, reaching a small ball only with probability
\(( r / | a | )^{n - 2}\), which is transience. The borderline sits
exactly at dimension two, where the logarithm replaces the power and
the balance between the two spheres tips from certainty to chance.
The statements about \(T_0\) in parts (2) and (3) are together the fact
taken on faith in the example of the
Bessel process. There the
Itô formula on an open domain
needed almost every path of Brownian motion started away from the
origin to avoid it for all time, in every dimension from two on, and
the polarity of points supplies exactly that. Part (1) is the
companion fact recorded there for the line, which is why that example
excluded dimension one.